Gaza GenoLIE Campaign Highlights the Manufactured Lie of "Genocidal Intent"
Claims of genocidal intent collapse under the weight of Israel’s stated objectives and its documented efforts to warn, evacuate and vaccinate Palestinian civilians
Jewish Onliner is an independent publication. If you find our work valuable, please consider becoming a paid subscriber. You can also subscribe to us on WhatsApp and Telegram. Follow us on YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, Discord, and X.
The fourth article in Jewish Onliner’s series on the Gaza GenoLIE campaign, launched by a coalition of 40 legal and civil society organizations, focuses on the distinction between Israel’s declared enemy and Gaza’s civilian population. Israel identified Hamas’s military and governing apparatus as the target of the war, while its forces employed mass warnings, evacuation procedures and humanitarian pauses intended to protect Palestinian civilians.
That record directly addresses the specific-intent element at the center of the genocide accusation. Israel’s stated objectives focused on defeating the terrorist organization responsible for the Oct. 7 massacre, recovering the hostages and preventing another attack, not destroying Palestinians as a group.
Israel Identified Hamas as the Target
On Oct. 7, 2023, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel would destroy Hamas’s military capabilities after the terrorist organization invaded southern Israel, murdered approximately 1,200 people and abducted 251 hostages.
When Israel formally declared war on Oct. 8, the Security Cabinet stated that its operational objective was to destroy the military and governing capabilities of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad so they could no longer threaten Israel.
Israel’s broader declarations established four objectives: recover the hostages, dismantle Hamas’s military capacity, remove Hamas as Gaza’s governing authority and prevent Gaza from being used to launch another Oct. 7-style attack.
None of those objectives identifies Palestinians as the enemy. They target an armed organization, its weapons, its governing infrastructure and its ability to conduct future attacks.
Civilian Warnings Were Built Into Israeli Operations
Israel’s conduct also included measures intended to move Palestinian civilians away from anticipated fighting.
A May 2026 report by the Israeli Embassy in Washington documented tens of millions of geographically targeted text messages and prerecorded telephone warnings, millions of air-dropped leaflets, evacuation corridors and regularly updated maps directing civilians away from combat zones.
The IDF also used live telephone calls, Arabic-language broadcasts and, in certain operations, small warning munitions known as “roof knocks” before larger strikes. The Embassy report states that warnings repeatedly cost Israel the element of surprise, allowed Hamas commanders to escape and caused operations to be delayed or altered as civilians evacuated.
These were operational measures, not simply statements of policy. They were designed to separate civilians from Hamas fighters and military infrastructure before attacks.
Modern urban warfare can produce as many as nine civilian casualties for every combatant casualty, according to widely cited UN and NGO estimates. In Gaza, urban warfare expert John Spencer estimated that approximately one civilian was killed for every combatant, one of the lowest estimated ratios in modern urban warfare.
Such a ratio, combined with Israel’s extensive warnings and evacuation measures, is incompatible with an intent to eradicate the Palestinian population.
Israel Paused Fighting to Vaccinate Gaza’s Children
The distinction became especially clear during Gaza’s polio outbreak.
After Gaza recorded its first polio case in 25 years, Israel agreed to localized pauses that allowed the World Health Organization, UNICEF, UNRWA and Palestinian health workers to conduct a mass vaccination campaign.
According to the World Health Organization, each phase of the first round was conducted under an area-specific humanitarian pause lasting nine hours per day. The vaccination drive reached 559,161 children under 10 during September 2024, representing approximately 95 percent of the estimated eligible population.
A second round reached 556,774 children, while a further vaccination drive during the February 2025 ceasefire reached nearly 603,000.
The pauses required military operations to be coordinated around the protection of Palestinian children, their families and vaccination teams. That conduct is inconsistent with the claim that destroying the Palestinian population was Israel’s objective.
Statements Were Separated From Their Context
The Gaza GenoLIE section also addresses statements repeatedly presented as evidence of genocidal intent.
On Oct. 9, then-Defense Minister Yoav Gallant said, “We are fighting human animals and acting accordingly.” The surrounding record shows Gallant repeatedly identifying Hamas as Israel’s enemy.
On Oct. 29, Gallant stated explicitly, “We are not fighting the Palestinian multitude and the Palestinian people in Gaza.” He continued to describe the war’s target as Hamas, its regime and its military infrastructure.
A similar distortion surrounds Netanyahu’s Oct. 28 reference to Amalek. Netanyahu said, “Remember what Amalek did to you,” and the government’s official transcript identifies the quotation as Deuteronomy 25:17.
South Africa’s filing at the International Court of Justice reproduced Netanyahu’s words, but its treatment of a second use of the same phrase linked it to 1 Samuel 15:3, a different passage containing an ancient command to destroy Amalek. An Israel Democracy Institute analysis found that the substitution transformed a verse about historical remembrance into a directive Netanyahu had not quoted.
The original verse also appears on the Amalek Monument in The Hague, now incorporated into the city’s Jewish monument commemorating a community devastated during the Holocaust. Its inscription reads, “Remember what Amalek has done to you... do not forget it,” and explicitly cites Deuteronomy 25:17-19.
The Evidence Establishes a Competing Explanation
As the previous Gaza GenoLIE article explained, the ICJ has held that when genocidal intent is inferred from a pattern of conduct, it must be the only reasonable inference that can be drawn.
Israel’s declared objectives provide a clear alternative explanation: the country entered Gaza to free hostages, dismantle Hamas’s military and governing capabilities and prevent another massacre. Its casualty ratio, mass warning system, evacuation procedures and participation in humanitarian vaccination pauses reflected a policy that distinguished Palestinian civilians from the terrorist organization governing Gaza.
The genocide accusation depends on erasing that distinction. The documented record identifies Hamas, not the Palestinian people, as the target of Israel’s war.