A Jewish Onliner investigation reveals that state-controlled outlets, some with terror ties, are cited over 30,000 times on Wikipedia, while American conservative alternative outlets are marginalized
Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia) has talked about this issue, and how it's biased toward left-wing aligned outlets. It's known AJ is used all over there. The thing is, according to their own standard it's unreliable at least when it comes to Israel, yet you see it being massively used in articles about the war. I can't understand how these people can even think a propaganda mouthpiece of an Islamic dictatorship could be reliable about anything. Or any outlet that is based in a place where there's no freedom of speech, thought and press.
Larry Sanger (co-founder of Wikipedia) has talked about this issue, and how it's biased toward left-wing aligned outlets. It's known AJ is used all over there. The thing is, according to their own standard it's unreliable at least when it comes to Israel, yet you see it being massively used in articles about the war. I can't understand how these people can even think a propaganda mouthpiece of an Islamic dictatorship could be reliable about anything. Or any outlet that is based in a place where there's no freedom of speech, thought and press.
Gratitude Mensch ✌🏻🤙🏻👍🏻