Students for Justice in Palestine Call for the "End of America"
National SJP, the umbrella group of the terror-supporting organization, issued the statement after the Trump Administration's airstrikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
A viral thread published overnight by independent journalist “Stu” on X has reignited scrutiny of the National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP), spotlighting a series of incendiary social media posts that critics say blur the line between student activism and material support for terrorism. Stu’s investigation details how NSJP’s official statement only glorifies violence but, according to legal authorities, directly align with the rhetoric and objectives of designated terrorist organizations.
In the following Instagram post, NSJP issued a radical statement regarding the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. They demand the end of America, support the Islamic Republic of Iran’s "right" to nuclear weapons, and accuse the U.S. of being a harmful propagandist.
Much of their reasoning is contradicting, as they label the Trump Administration’s airstrikes as an unprovoked attack, but simultaneously justify Iran’s “resistance” via proxy warfare and criticize the U.S. for not tolerating “popular resistance.”
The "student movement" has been accused of extremism for actions like wearing terrorist symbols, occupying buildings, and infringing on others' rights. Protests can and should be conducted peacefully without disrupting campuses or endangering others.
In reaction to the NSPJ’s claim that Iran’s nuclear production was in compliance with the NPT and IAEA , Stu’s commentary clarifies, enriching uranium beyond 5% serves no clear purpose for civilian energy generation and is often interpreted as a step toward acquiring nuclear weapons capability. “Natural uranium: 0.7% U-235, Power reactors: 3–5%, Weapons-grade: 90%.”
NSPJ conclude their post by reiterating their dedication to fighting Zionism and imperialism through revolutionary socialism. Considering the presentation begins with a call to end the empire, it is clear this refers to the dismantling of both America and Israel.
These posts, critics argue, are not isolated incidents but part of a coordinated campaign that constitutes incitement, glorification of terrorism, and material support for Hamas. They have been cited in congressional hearings, university disciplinary actions, and ongoing lawsuits as direct evidence of NSJP’s alignment with terrorist objectives.
Congressional Criticism and Calls for Action
The aftermath of the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks saw NSJP and its chapters issue statements that openly praised the violence and called for “armed confrontation.” This was not lost on lawmakers. Congressman Randy Fine has repeatedly used his official platform to highlight NSJP’s alignment with terrorist propaganda and to demand federal action. In May 2024, 16 Republican senators formally urged the Department of Justice and the IRS to investigate NSJP’s financial and organizational links for violations of anti-terrorism statutes. The Senate HELP Committee also launched a probe into NSJP’s relationship with American Muslims for Palestine (AMP), which is under suspicion for historical and ongoing ties to Hamas. These are not idle accusations, federal and state investigations, civil lawsuits, and university bans are all underway, with the express goal of exposing and prosecuting NSJP’s alleged material support for terrorism.
Origins and Narrative of SJP
Students for Justice in Palestine was founded in 2001 at the University of California, Berkeley, by Hatem Bazian, who also established American Muslims for Palestine. The group’s narrative is explicitly anti-Zionist, anti-Western, anti-European, and anti-NATO, framing its cause as part of a global struggle against “state violence, colonialism, capitalism, and imperialism.” While NSJP’s public messaging often employs rights-based language, it also features calls for “days of resistance” and slogans like “From the River to the Sea,” which are euphemisms for terrorism and the elimination of Israel. This dual narrative, combining social justice themes with militant rhetoric, has allowed NSJP to mobilize a broad student base while attracting scrutiny from legal authorities and university administrators. The group’s strong ties to AMP, its fiscal sponsor, further entangle it in a network of organizations that have been investigated for allegedly funneling funds to Hamas and promoting pro-Hamas propaganda.
The Broader Implications
While the U.S. legal framework for designating terrorist organizations requires foreign status and direct involvement in terrorism, NSJP’s rhetoric, actions, and affiliations have triggered significant scrutiny. Critics argue that the group’s narrative and social media activity go far beyond protected speech, instead providing cover for violent extremist objectives under the guise of student activism. As investigations continue, the debate over NSJP’s role on American campuses and its potential legal liabilities shows no signs of abating.