A New York Times shareholder, backed by an expanded legal team, is demanding board-level records over the paper’s Israel coverage and reporting on Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner
NYT took 5 SECONDS to report that Israel bombed a hospital killing 500 Gazans, as told to them by HAMAS. As soon as they reported the truth that it was Hamas that ‘accidentally’ bombed their own hospital, the casualty count suddenly went down to about 100 tragic souls.
It took the NYT, however, three and a half MONTHS to ‘verify’ the mass rapes, mutilations and murders of numerous Israeli women, girls and some men. Much of the evidence was filmed by Hamas themselves as psychological torture for the families of victims. But the NYT had to take MONTHS to print the truth so that spoiled, racist, homophonic, gang rape denying, Jew hating brats like Rama Duwaji (Mamdani’s wife) wouldn’t get upset. That the NYT has been anti-Israel and essentially pro-Hamas for decades, IS the story.
“there is no rhetorical counter-strategy that solves what is fundamentally an economic and legal problem. As long as antisemitic transgression is profitable and cost-free, the market will supply it in increasing quantities. The response that actually matters is not a better argument - it is making the transgression costly again. That means advertiser pressure, platform consequences, and where applicable, prosecution. Not because those tools are pleasant or easy, but because they are the only ones that operate on the reward structure rather than the content.": https://elderofziyon.substack.com/p/antisemitism-is-the-new-edginess
It is unfortunate that the NYT is basically telling us all that Donald Trump was correct is his assessment of the paper as a cesspool of woke and self righteous liberals who have no issue with doxing and libel as long as it’s from the morally pure schmucks like kristoff and sachs and
Yes and unfortunately that report by Kristoff was his third piece that eventually turned out to be not so true. The first was in regards to the anthrax letters in 2001 when Kristoff pretty much went after a man later acquitted but whose life was ruined. The second was the Somaly Mam pieces about sex traffickers in Cambodia and in turned out that individuals had been coached on what to say to keep the story going. NYT likes to think of itself as great but frankly it’s simply a tattletale rather spills oceans of ink on every stupid thing trump does yet real news stories - Ebola out break, Sudanese attacks, Nigeria vs Boko Haram, are no longer given much coverage. Even the report of the rapes and sexual violence of Jewish women got a lackluster airing and not so impressive opinion pieces.
NYT took 5 SECONDS to report that Israel bombed a hospital killing 500 Gazans, as told to them by HAMAS. As soon as they reported the truth that it was Hamas that ‘accidentally’ bombed their own hospital, the casualty count suddenly went down to about 100 tragic souls.
It took the NYT, however, three and a half MONTHS to ‘verify’ the mass rapes, mutilations and murders of numerous Israeli women, girls and some men. Much of the evidence was filmed by Hamas themselves as psychological torture for the families of victims. But the NYT had to take MONTHS to print the truth so that spoiled, racist, homophonic, gang rape denying, Jew hating brats like Rama Duwaji (Mamdani’s wife) wouldn’t get upset. That the NYT has been anti-Israel and essentially pro-Hamas for decades, IS the story.
That’s ‘homophobic.’
“there is no rhetorical counter-strategy that solves what is fundamentally an economic and legal problem. As long as antisemitic transgression is profitable and cost-free, the market will supply it in increasing quantities. The response that actually matters is not a better argument - it is making the transgression costly again. That means advertiser pressure, platform consequences, and where applicable, prosecution. Not because those tools are pleasant or easy, but because they are the only ones that operate on the reward structure rather than the content.": https://elderofziyon.substack.com/p/antisemitism-is-the-new-edginess
It is unfortunate that the NYT is basically telling us all that Donald Trump was correct is his assessment of the paper as a cesspool of woke and self righteous liberals who have no issue with doxing and libel as long as it’s from the morally pure schmucks like kristoff and sachs and
Yes and unfortunately that report by Kristoff was his third piece that eventually turned out to be not so true. The first was in regards to the anthrax letters in 2001 when Kristoff pretty much went after a man later acquitted but whose life was ruined. The second was the Somaly Mam pieces about sex traffickers in Cambodia and in turned out that individuals had been coached on what to say to keep the story going. NYT likes to think of itself as great but frankly it’s simply a tattletale rather spills oceans of ink on every stupid thing trump does yet real news stories - Ebola out break, Sudanese attacks, Nigeria vs Boko Haram, are no longer given much coverage. Even the report of the rapes and sexual violence of Jewish women got a lackluster airing and not so impressive opinion pieces.
It's about time they re held accountable for garbage they print